Eye of Modok

Solar powered lights in Beijing parks are great, but something is wrong with this picture!

While the finger-pointers in the West may look scornfully upon China as the biggest threat to global warming, despite that fact that many of China’s emissions are a direct result of offshoring by said finger-pointing countries in an effort sate the mindless consumerism of the local residents, who don’t want such dirty stinky polluting factories in their own back yards, especially as it wouldn’t be “environmentally friendly”, few may be aware that from a policy standpoint, at least, China is in many ways ahead of the pack. Now if we can only work on execution…

There is, sadly, a major disconnect between the lofty heights of academia and government, and the real world of practical implementation. I’m not even talking about the selfish money-centered attitude that manifests out of a universal human tendency to choose what it is good for an individual personally, even at the cost of the community as a whole. I’m talking about something far more fundamental. Knowledge takes time to trickle into human consciousness, despite the best intentions.

If you haven’t taken a good look at the picture above, please do so now, and see if you can find something wrong with the picture. At first glance, the picture can be seen as a true measure of progress… solar powered street lights using CFL lamps in a public park in Beijing. However, something went dreadfully wrong with the installation - a major disconnect between the supplier of the new technology and the park planners. Have you guessed correctly! Well done! Go to the head of the class.

For those of you who aren’t as familiar with the nuts and bolts of renewable energy technologies, take a look at the orientation of the solar PV panels atop each street light. They are all facing different directions! Some are facing in opposite directions!! Which means that they are working at a fraction of their capacity, as solar panels should be aligned for maximum exposure to solar radiation throughout the day, in a southward direction in the northern hemisphere. Ideally, the angle of the panel should be adjusted for the time of year, as the sun is much lower in the sky during the winter than in the summer.

Now, it could very well be that the designers of the panels have over-designed them to be able to operate in spite of such gross inefficiencies, but if this is so, then this too is simply inefficient. As solar panels are still rather costly to produce and come with an environmental price tag when considering their manufacturing process, as well as disposal and recycling, greater care and consideration should accompany their use.

So, what are your views? Am I overly critical? Not critical enough? You tell me.

My friend percussionist Larry Mahlis sent me a link to a wonderful site that I think has the potential to change lives, and, perhaps, even the world. The Story of Stuff is the brainchild of Annie Leonard, and I must say, I like her brain.

Here’s a description from the site:

From its extraction through sale, use and disposal, all the stuff in our lives affects communities at home and abroad, yet most of this is hidden from view. The Story of Stuff is a 20-minute, fast-paced, fact-filled look at the underside of our production and consumption patterns. The Story of Stuff exposes the connections between a huge number of environmental and social issues, and calls us together to create a more sustainable and just world. It’ll teach you something, it’ll make you laugh, and it just may change the way you look at all the stuff in your life forever.

One of the things I enjoyed most about the presentation is the way it call attention to the fact that even if we decide to move our dirty, stinking, toxic polluting factories overseas, it does not make us any less culpable for the damage thus caused. It’s all too easy for the media to get up in arms about lead paint in toys from China, yet neglect to comment at all about the toxic damage done to the workers and the environment in “the factory of the world.” Christine Lu has some good comments on the subject.

Please stop what you are doing and watch this video, and then tell all of your family and friends about it!

Ladies and gentlemen, may I draw your attention to the curtain over here, to where the beautiful Miss Wong is standing … Now watch carefully… I am now going to make US$4 trillion magically disappear!!

OK, while it may not have been that dramatic in the execution, that is in effect what the World Bank recently did when they published updated statistics on the economic output of 146 countries, utilizing a method called “Purchasing Power Parity” (PPP) leading to a revised estimate of China’s GDP to $6 trillion. This is down from previous statistics which had it pegged at $10 trillion.

From the World Bank website:

In a report ranking the world’s economies for 2005, the World Bank said its updated survey using ‘purchasing power parity’ (PPP) shows a much smaller value for China than earlier estimates…The [International Comparison Program] study carried out by the World Bank and other partners was ‘the most extensive and thorough effort to measure the relative size of 146 economies using the PPP method which strips out the effect of exchange rates…

So, what impact can be expected by such an evaporation of trillions of dollars? Well, China is still the number two economy in the world, but the point at which it can be expected to overtake that of the US would certainly appear to be pushed back a few years. And the domestic problems it faces due to widespread poverty may begin to seem a bit heavier a burden.

In an article in the Los Angeles Times, Walter Russell Mead summed it up like this:

For Americans, the new numbers from the World Bank bring good news and bad. On the plus side, U.S. leadership in the global system seems more secure and more likely to endure through the next generation. On the other hand, the world we are called on to lead is poorer and more troubled than we anticipated.

While its true that China is one of the largest investors in the house of cards that is the US economy, it may very well turn out that as this century progresses, the rest of the world might start investing more and more in China, and Chinese currency, and less and less in the US dollar. The Chinese yuan may even become the preferred currency in the world. Still, $4 trillion vanishing into thin air must certainly be having a chilling effect in Beijing this New Year’s, beyond that which the cold Siberian wind blowing down from the north brings .